Silent Annexation: The Fate of Southern Syria

Caught in the crosscurrents of escalating regional and international rivalries, and witnessing an increasingly assertive Israeli presence, Southern Syria stands at a critical juncture. Ambiguity hangs heavy in the air, obscuring the long-term trajectory of a land grappling with fractured governance, demographic shifts, and the looming threat of further fragmentation. As international and regional actors jostle for influence and advantage, Israel's expansionist ambitions in the south proceed with a disconcerting sense of ease, guided by a methodical strategy and far-reaching objectives. This expansion, however, is not merely territorial; it is reshaping the very fabric of Southern Syria, impacting its social and demographic tapestry, and transforming it into a volatile arena for regional proxy conflicts. Meanwhile, the Syrian state, nominally in Damascus, grapples with deep-seated internal divisions and a diminished capacity to exert meaningful control, potentially paving the way for negative scenarios that threaten the nation's already fragile unity and sovereignty. This analysis aims to dissect these complex transformations, illuminating Israel’s calculated strategy, assessing the internal vulnerabilities of Syria, and anticipating the potential risks that lie ahead for this strategically vital, yet increasingly precarious, region.

The descriptor “comfortable” Israeli expansion encapsulates a deeply concerning reality: Israel’s actions in Southern Syria are proceeding with a perceived lack of significant resistance or effective deterrence. This comfort is not accidental; it is the product of a carefully constructed, systematic strategy underpinned by clearly defined, long-term goals. Israeli expansionism in this context transcends mere tactical responses to immediate threats. It represents a calculated, multifaceted approach aimed at consolidating strategic depth, securing vital resources, and fundamentally altering the geopolitical landscape to Israel’s advantage.

This “comfortable creep” manifests in various interconnected ways. Firstly, it involves the establishment and expansion of a security zone along the Golan Heights, effectively annexing Syrian territory under the guise of self-defence. This is not simply about border security; it’s about creating a buffer zone, pushing back perceived threats, and establishing a permanent Israeli presence in strategically valuable areas. Secondly, it involves the cultivation of relationships with local actors, including various armed groups and communities within Southern Syria, effectively creating a network of proxies and informants that serve Israeli interests. This strategy allows Israel to exert influence and gather intelligence deep within Syrian territory without deploying large numbers of its own forces, minimizing risk and maximizing operational reach. Thirdly, it involves the subtle yet persistent exploitation of resources, particularly water resources, in the Golan and surrounding areas, further entrenching Israeli control and potentially exacerbating existing resource scarcity within Syria. These actions, taken together, constitute a systematic, long-term strategy aimed at fundamentally reshaping Southern Syria in a manner that serves Israel’s strategic, security, and resource-related objectives. The “comfort” with which this expansion proceeds underscores a perceived absence of robust counter-strategies from Damascus or its allies, and a regional and international environment where Israel feels emboldened to act with relative impunity.

The Israeli expansion, alongside the broader Syrian conflict, is having a devastating impact on the demographic structure and regional control within Southern Syria. Years of conflict, coupled with targeted interventions and manipulations by various actors, are leading to forced displacement, sectarian tensions, and the deliberate alteration of the existing social order. Palestinian refugee populations, long present in Southern Syria, find themselves in increasingly precarious situations, often caught between competing factions and vulnerable to further displacement. Sunni Arab communities, who historically formed the demographic majority in many areas of Southern Syria, have been disproportionately affected by the conflict, with many displaced or marginalized, creating demographic imbalances and fuelling sectarian grievances. Conversely, there are reports of demographic engineering in certain areas, potentially aimed at strengthening the presence of groups aligned with external actors, further fragmenting the social landscape and undermining any prospect of future social cohesion.

This demographic upheaval directly contributes to the “exploding” of regional control. The Syrian state, weakened by years of civil war and lacking legitimacy in many parts of the south, is increasingly unable to exert meaningful control over these fractured communities and territories. Regional control is effectively shifting away from Damascus and towards a complex patchwork of local armed groups, tribal militias, and external actors wielding influence through proxies. This fragmented control landscape creates fertile ground for further instability, lawlessness, and the potential for long-term conflict. The absence of a legitimate and effective central authority allows external powers, including Israel and others, to further entrench their influence, exploit resources, and pursue their own agendas with minimal constraints, perpetuating a cycle of instability and undermining any prospects for Syrian national unity or territorial integrity.

The Turkish-Israeli Competition in Southern Syria highlights a significant, though often less discussed, dimension of the regional power dynamics at play. While the Israeli-Palestinian conflict understandably dominates narratives concerning Israel’s regional engagements, the evolving relationship between Israel and Turkey, particularly in the Syrian context, adds another layer of complexity and potential instability. Both Turkey and Israel, despite periods of diplomatic tension and diverging geopolitical interests, are key regional players with significant and distinct agendas in Syria. Turkey, with its historical ties to the region and its ambition to project power in its near abroad, has established a significant military presence in Northern Syria and is increasingly seeking to expand its influence southward. Israel, focused on its security concerns and expansionist aims, is actively working to consolidate its control in the south and prevent the emergence of hostile actors or Iranian-backed proxies along its borders.

This latent Turkish-Israeli competition manifests in various forms. It includes vying for influence among local Syrian groups, potentially supporting different factions or playing them off against each other. It involves competition for strategic territory and resources, particularly along border regions and key transportation routes. And it increasingly plays out in the information and diplomatic spheres, with both countries seeking to shape the narrative and influence international perceptions of the Syrian conflict and their respective roles within it. While a direct military confrontation between Turkey and Israel in Southern Syria remains unlikely in the short term, this underlying competition adds another layer of volatility to the already complex dynamics of the region. It further fragments the landscape of control, complicates efforts towards stabilization, and creates opportunities for miscalculation and unintended escalation, potentially exacerbating the existing instability and hindering any prospects for a unified and stable Syria.

The Partition Scenario represents the ultimate worst-case outcome for Southern Syria and, indeed, for the Syrian state as a whole. While perhaps not an explicitly stated goal of any single actor, the trajectory of events in Southern Syria, driven by Israeli expansion, demographic shifts, fractured control, and regional competition, increasingly raises the spectre of de facto, if not formal, partition. The weakening of the central Syrian state, coupled with the rise of localized power centres and the entrenchment of external influence, creates conditions ripe for fragmentation. Southern Syria, already semi-autonomous in many respects, could effectively become a separate entity, divided along lines of control influenced by Israel, local factions, and potentially other regional actors.

This partition scenario could manifest in several ways. It might involve the formal annexation of further Syrian territory by Israel, beyond the Golan Heights, creating a clearly defined and internationally recognized border. More likely, it could evolve into a de facto partition, with Southern Syria existing as a zone of Israeli influence and control, effectively detached from the rest of Syria but without a formal declaration of independence or annexation. Regardless of the precise form, partition would have devastating consequences for Syria’s territorial integrity, national unity, and future stability. It would solidify the erosion of Syrian sovereignty, further empower non-state actors, and potentially trigger further conflict and displacement, not only within Southern Syria but across the wider region. The partition scenario, while still a potential future outcome rather than a current reality, is increasingly becoming a plausible and deeply concerning trajectory, driven by the confluence of factors actively reshaping Southern Syria.

Underpinning the comfortable Israeli expansion and the growing risks of fragmentation is the critical issue of “Lack of Deterrence and National Unity” within Syria itself. Damascus is demonstrably unable to effectively deter Israeli actions in the south or to project meaningful authority into the region. This lack of deterrence stems from a combination of factors. Years of civil war have significantly weakened the Syrian military, both in terms of its conventional capabilities and its overall morale and cohesion. The Assad regime, while surviving the conflict, remains deeply internally divided, lacking broad-based legitimacy and struggling to consolidate control even in areas nominally under its rule. International isolation and sanctions have further hampered the regime’s ability to rebuild its military and project power, leaving it vulnerable to external pressures and interventions.

This deterrence deficit is inextricably linked to the broader issue of national unity. The Syrian state is profoundly fractured along sectarian, ethnic, and political lines. Years of conflict have deepened these divisions, eroding any sense of shared national identity or common purpose. The regime’s reliance on sectarian and loyalist militias further undermines national unity, creating parallel power structures and perpetuating cycles of violence and fragmentation. Without a cohesive and unified Syrian state, capable of projecting authority and commanding the loyalty of its diverse population, the prospects for effectively deterring external aggression or preventing further territorial fragmentation remain bleak. The internal decay of national unity and the corresponding lack of deterrence create a vacuum that external powers, like Israel, are readily exploiting, further exacerbating the existing vulnerabilities and pushing Southern Syria closer to a future defined by instability, fragmentation, and diminished Syrian sovereignty.

To sum up, Southern Syria stands precariously balanced on an edge, facing a future laden with uncertainty and potential fragmentation. Israeli expansion, proceeding with a chilling sense of ease, is not just a territorial issue; it is a deeply destabilizing force reshaping the social, demographic, and political landscape of the region. Coupled with internal Syrian vulnerabilities – a weakened state, fractured national unity, and a lack of effective deterrence – and the complex interplay of regional rivalries, particularly the emerging Turkish-Israeli competition, the trajectory for Southern Syria points towards further instability and potentially irreversible fragmentation.  The “partition scenario,” while not inevitable, is no longer a distant hypothetical but a grimly plausible outcome, reflecting the cumulative impact of these converging forces. Critically, exacerbating these security and political challenges is the dire economic situation gripping Syria.  Without the economic relief that the removal of sanctions makes possible, the prospects for a sustainable, legitimate political transition, crucial for long-term stability in Southern Syria and the nation as a whole, will become even more uncertain. With spoilers – both internal and external – actively seizing every opportunity to derail Syria’s fragile transition, deferring meaningful economic recovery is, in effect, a recipe for intensified chaos and deeper discord, further weakening the prospects for national unity and increasing the vulnerability of regions like Southern Syria to fragmentation. And while Western governments understandably hold back on broad sanctions relief, carefully assessing the new regime responsiveness and commitment to genuine change, the administration in Damascus is no doubt mirroring this caution, keeping its own balance sheet of how its appeals for relief are being received in Western capitals and factoring this into its own strategic calculations.

Preventing the worst-case scenarios in Southern Syria, and indeed for Syria as a whole, therefore requires a multifaceted and concerted effort that must include addressing the economic crisis. Strengthening Syrian national unity, promoting inclusive governance, and fostering a sense of shared national identity remain paramount, though immensely challenging in the current context, and are rendered even more difficult in the face of economic collapse. Regional and international actors must move beyond narrow self-interests and engage in a genuine, coordinated effort to de-escalate tensions, support a negotiated political settlement for Syria that includes economic recovery, and uphold the principles of Syrian sovereignty and territorial integrity.  Failing to address these interconnected challenges – political, security, and economic – risks condemning Southern Syria to a future of protracted instability, deepening fragmentation, and continued suffering for its population, with potentially wider regional repercussions. The shifting sands of Southern Syria demand urgent attention and a fundamental rethinking of current approaches, before the region’s fate is irrevocably sealed by the forces of fragmentation, external domination, and now, economic despair.

“In Israeli-occupied South Syria, Villagers Feel Abandoned,” FRANCE 24, December 21, 2024, https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20241221-in-israeli-occupied-south-syria-villagers-feel-abandoned

Aslı Aydıntaşbaş, “Topple, Tame, Trade: How Turkey Is Rewriting Syria’s Future,” ECFR, February 6, 2025, accessed March 12, 2025, https://ecfr.eu/article/topple-tame-trade-how-turkey-is-rewriting-syrias-future/

Cathrin Schaer, “What Is Israel Doing in Syria, and Why?,” Dw.Com, March 4, 2025, https://www.dw.com/en/what-is-israel-doing-in-syria-and-why/a-71824463

Emanuel Fabian, “Katz says Israel will soon allow Syrian Druze to work in the Golan Heights,” The Times of Israel, March 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/katz-says-israel-will-soon-allow-syrian-druze-to-work-in-the-golan-heights/

Fabrice Balanche, “Sectarianism in Syria’s Civil War a Geopolitical Study,” The Washington Institute, February 5, 2018, accessed March 12, 2025, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/sectarianism-syrias-civil-war-geopolitical-study

Murat Guneylioglu, “Reconsidering Turkey’s Influence on the Syrian Conflict,” Royal United Services Institute, January 31, 2025, accessed March 12, 2025, https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/reconsidering-turkeys-influence-syrian-conflict

Nour Samaha, “ISRAEL’S ‘SAFE ZONE’ IS CREEPING FARTHER INTO SYRIA,” The Intercept, July 23, 2018, https://theintercept.com/2018/01/23/israel-syria-safe-buffer-zone-golan-heights/

Sebastian Usher, “Israel Demands Complete Demilitarisation of Southern Syria,” BBC News, February 24, 2025, accessed March 12, 2025, https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgenz02lp8o

Steven Heydemann, “Syria Needs Sanctions Relief Now,” Brookings, January 15, 2025, accessed March 12, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/syria-needs-sanctions-relief-now/

Ward, Euan. “Israel Strikes Syria Again as Tensions Rise.” The New York Times, March 4, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/04/world/middleeast/israel-syria-strikes.html.